Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi (latter half of the second and beginning of the third century C.E.), considered to be the redactor of the Codification of basic Jewish Oral Law; edited and arranged by R. Judah ha-Nasi c. 200 C.E. Mishnah , made a statement that started a trend of legal development resulting in the elimination of the category of normal menstruation and its replacement by the category of abnormal bleeding, ziva. His statement reflects the possible confusion in keeping track of one’s period, especially in light of the new system of pithei niddah. If this was done intentionally, the couple incurred the punishment of karet; if done unintentionally, they were obligated to bring a sin offering. Atonement by sacrifice, however, could not be made after the destruction of the Temple in the year 70 C.E. Great efforts were therefore made to prevent inadvertent sins of this nature. BT Niddah 66a gives us Rabbi’s statement: “R. Joseph citing Rav Judah who had it from Rav stated: Rabbi ordained at Sadot: If a woman observed a discharge on one day she must wait six days in addition to it. If she observed discharges on two days she must wait six days in addition to these. If she observed a discharge on three days she must wait seven clean days.”
Amoraim could not argument tannaitic rulings as opposed to tannaitic help however they authored fences inside the Torah to cease inadvertent sins
So it declaration from the Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi essentially removed all menstruating female regarding normal menstrual class and you will placed them from the abnormal position regarding zava since the majority typical episodes last at the very least 3 days. Apparently his question is actually that considering the cutting-edge clarifications had a need to determine when you’re niddah and if one may getting an excellent zava, feeld one you’ll come to not work right that have grievous effects. 1st the latest decree got limited perception; it looks getting become local, and will was in fact limited by times when question was inside and local populace was not good enough discovered to choose inside the for example factors ( Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac; b. Indeed it wasn’t a general decree for everybody out of Israel, it are the initial step because advice. In the first two examples, Rabbi’s report deals with a female who is a small zava or may be a niddah. The woman is handled in the first situation since an excellent niddah, with a good eight-time period of impurity, in lieu of someday off impurity during the day of bleeding, which is the laws getting a small zava. From the 2nd analogy she’s addressed as good niddah and you can a small zava if your first-day is from inside the the woman ziva months (new 11 months between menstrual attacks). On third problem, she actually is addressed as the an entire zava. Every three rulings make a whole lot more stringent position.
Troyes, France, 1040 Rashi )
Subsequent statements by other sages make it absolutely certain that it was understood to be a general ent are from the amoraim, the sages who created the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmudim. We find a aic) “spokesman.” Scholars active during the period from the completion of the Mishnah (c. 200 C.E.) until the completion of the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds (end of the fourth and fifth centuries respectively), who were active primarily in the interpretation of the Mishnah. In the chain of tradition they follow the tanna’im and precede the savora’im. amora Rav Huna in JT Berakhot (5:1, 8d): “Rav Huna said: One who sees a drop of blood like [the size of a] mustard seed sits and keeps [because of it] seven clean days. Afterwards he stood to pray.” The statement was made as an example of an undisputed law from which one could then turn to prayer. Such a law would clear one’s mind because there were no arguments about it, thereby allowing one to focus totally on prayer. Rav Huna’s statement is much more radical than the tannaitic version quoted above. According to him, all women who see uterine blood are in the category of the complete zava, regardless of the size of the blood stain and despite the normalcy of menstruation or having seen such blood only one or two days.